Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 5:30:36 GMT 1
There are numerous obstacles facing the global food system as it seeks to feed 10 billion people by 2050, while using fewer resources and ensuring minimal land use.
According to TriplePundit , the global COVID-19 pandemic has made the challenges of the food and agriculture sector even more evident as more citizens face food insecurity.
But even if a crisis can give rise to an opportunity, the Chile Mobile Number List companies that power the global food system have a huge learning curve looming in the coming years if we as a society are to produce enough food without mowing down the planet's landscape.
The impact of agriculture
Human rights activists have long worried about the impact of the search for more farmland on indigenous and poorer communities. Agriculture-related emissions are another culprit that food and beverage companies must confront in the coming years.
Concern should also focus on natural habitats, according to a study published in the journal Nature . The group of researchers who came together on this paper concluded that we can expect to see millions of square miles of biodiversity-rich land disappear by 2050.
After assessing the habitats of nearly 20,000 species, researchers found that nearly 90% could see the land they roam on lost to cropland by mid-century; Almost 1,300 could lose more than 25% of their natural habitat.
Michael Clark, an environmental sustainability researcher at the University of Oxford and one of the lead authors of the study, in an interview with The Independent , commented:
Until we start to consider what we eat, how it is produced and everything else, we are not going to make large-scale progress towards existing conservation and biodiversity goals.
Michael Clark, environmental sustainability researcher at the University of Oxford.
For food companies that manage global supply chains and also say they are committed to preventing biodiversity loss, this study adds another layer of complexity to their sustainability programs.
The study's authors made clear that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to managing the world's food supply in the coming years. There are several tactics, such as reducing meat and dairy consumption, fighting food waste, and finding new ways to increase crop yields.
The growing interest in plant proteins in North America, for example, could help manage that problem on this side of the pond, but that change will do nothing in regions where meat consumption has been quite low for a long time. and food insecurity looms as a constant threat. By contrast, talk of increasing yields in regions like sub-Saharan Africa—where evidence suggests such a shift is already occurring—makes sense. But several time zones away, American farmers have largely won that battle in recent decades.
Some food and beverage companies are taking steps to ensure a more sustainable supply chain. However, it is clear that the time to rethink our global food system was yesterday, and companies and their suppliers will need to consider a wide range of strategies to rise to the task of growing more food with a minimum of destruction.
According to TriplePundit , the global COVID-19 pandemic has made the challenges of the food and agriculture sector even more evident as more citizens face food insecurity.
But even if a crisis can give rise to an opportunity, the Chile Mobile Number List companies that power the global food system have a huge learning curve looming in the coming years if we as a society are to produce enough food without mowing down the planet's landscape.
The impact of agriculture
Human rights activists have long worried about the impact of the search for more farmland on indigenous and poorer communities. Agriculture-related emissions are another culprit that food and beverage companies must confront in the coming years.
Concern should also focus on natural habitats, according to a study published in the journal Nature . The group of researchers who came together on this paper concluded that we can expect to see millions of square miles of biodiversity-rich land disappear by 2050.
After assessing the habitats of nearly 20,000 species, researchers found that nearly 90% could see the land they roam on lost to cropland by mid-century; Almost 1,300 could lose more than 25% of their natural habitat.
Michael Clark, an environmental sustainability researcher at the University of Oxford and one of the lead authors of the study, in an interview with The Independent , commented:
Until we start to consider what we eat, how it is produced and everything else, we are not going to make large-scale progress towards existing conservation and biodiversity goals.
Michael Clark, environmental sustainability researcher at the University of Oxford.
For food companies that manage global supply chains and also say they are committed to preventing biodiversity loss, this study adds another layer of complexity to their sustainability programs.
The study's authors made clear that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to managing the world's food supply in the coming years. There are several tactics, such as reducing meat and dairy consumption, fighting food waste, and finding new ways to increase crop yields.
The growing interest in plant proteins in North America, for example, could help manage that problem on this side of the pond, but that change will do nothing in regions where meat consumption has been quite low for a long time. and food insecurity looms as a constant threat. By contrast, talk of increasing yields in regions like sub-Saharan Africa—where evidence suggests such a shift is already occurring—makes sense. But several time zones away, American farmers have largely won that battle in recent decades.
Some food and beverage companies are taking steps to ensure a more sustainable supply chain. However, it is clear that the time to rethink our global food system was yesterday, and companies and their suppliers will need to consider a wide range of strategies to rise to the task of growing more food with a minimum of destruction.